Cost-utility, cost-effectiveness, and budget impact of Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for breast cancer survivors with treatment-induced menopausal symptoms

Research article published on Springer link. 2019 August 26

AUTHORS: J.G.E. Verbeek,V. Atema, JC Mewes, M. van Leeuwen, H.S.A. Oldenburg, M. van Beurden, M.S. Hunter, W.H. van Harten, N.K. Aaronson, V.P. Retèl  


Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT), with and without therapist support, is effective in reducing treatment-induced menopausal symptoms and perceived impact of hot flushes and night sweats (HF/NS) in breast cancer survivors. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the cost-utility, cost-effectiveness, and budget impact of both iCBT formats compared to a waiting list control group from the Dutch healthcare perspective.

A Markov model was constructed with a 5-year time horizon. Costs and health outcomes were measured alongside a randomized controlled clinical trial and included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), overall levels of menopausal symptoms, and perceived impact of HF/NS. Uncertainty was examined using probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses, together with a scenario analysis incorporating a different perspective.

iCBT was slightly more expensive than the waiting list control, but also more effective, resulting in incremental cost-utility ratios of €23,331/QALY and €11,277/QALY for the guided and self-managed formats, respectively. A significant reduction in overall levels of menopausal symptoms or perceived impact of HF/NS resulted in incremental costs between €1460 and €1525 for the guided and €500–€753 for the self-managed format. The estimated annual budget impact for the Netherlands was €192,990 for the guided and €74,592 for the self-managed format.

Based on the current trial data, the results indicate that both guided and self-managed iCBT are cost-effective with a willingness-to-pay threshold of well below €30,000/QALY. Additionally, self-managed iCBT is the most cost-effective strategy and has a lower impact on healthcare budgets.

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/3″][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1563440186370{margin-top: 10px !important;}”]Keywords: Implementation fidelity; Integrated care; Mixed methods; Post-discharge care; Transitional care[/vc_column_text][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1555607586280{margin-top: -4px !important;}”][vc_btn title=”Full-text article (Sage Journals)” style=”custom” custom_background=”#8eb223″ custom_text=”#ffffff” align=”center” i_icon_fontawesome=”fa fa-arrow-right” button_block=”true” add_icon=”true” link=”|title:Springer%20link|target:%20_blank|”][vc_separator][vc_posts_slider type=”flexslider_slide” count=”All” interval=”0″ slides_content=”teaser” slides_title=”1″ title=”See also:” posttypes=”post” categories=”publications” css=”.vc_custom_1555606478402{background-position: center !important;background-repeat: no-repeat !important;background-size: contain !important;}”][/vc_column][vc_column][vc_empty_space][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row full_width=”stretch_row” css=”.vc_custom_1548353430222{background-color: #8a1465 !important;}”][vc_column][vc_empty_space height=”2px”][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Let us help you in making your innovation count.