[vc_row full_width=”stretch_row” css=”.vc_custom_1548353430222{background-color: #8a1465 !important;}”][vc_column][vc_empty_space height=”10px”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row full_width=”stretch_row”][vc_column][vc_empty_space height=”4px”][vc_custom_heading source=”post_title” font_container=”tag:h1|text_align:left|color:%23333333″ google_fonts=”font_family:Raleway%3A100%2C200%2C300%2Cregular%2C500%2C600%2C700%2C800%2C900|font_style:400%20regular%3A400%3Anormal”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”2/3″][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1614683717396{margin-top: 5px !important;margin-right: 5px !important;margin-bottom: 5px !important;margin-left: 5px !important;border-top-width: 2px !important;padding-top: 20px !important;padding-right: 20px !important;padding-bottom: 20px !important;padding-left: 20px !important;background-color: #ededed !important;}”]Research article published on Sage Journals, in Methodological Innovations January-April 2021
AUTHORS: Su Aw, Gerald CH Koh, Yeon Ju Oh, Mee Lian Wong, Hubertus JM Vrijhoef, Susana C Harding, Mary Ann B Geronimo and Zoe J-l Hildon.
ABSTRACT
Geospatial-qualitative methods, which combine both observation and interpretative accounts during data collection through extended exposure and movement in place, have been increasingly used to explore “person–place” interactions and assess communities of place. Despite their increased use, there is a lack of reflexive discussion on how they differ in capturing person–place interactions and ways to combine them. Drawing on our experiences using three related methods—Photovoice, Walking through Spaces, and interactive Participatory Learning and Action exercise-led community focus groups— we compared the methodological advantages that each method brings to the construction of “place” and in exploring person–place interactions among the community of older adults living in a neighborhood of Singapore for a neighborhood assessment. We then illustrated how using a Focus–Expand–Compare approach for methodological triangulation can add
value in generating greater depth and breadth of perspectives on a topic of interest explored for intervention development.
Please find the complete article under the link.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/3″][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1614683464392{margin-top: 10px !important;}”]Keywords: Methodological triangulation, person–place interactions, geospatial-qualitative methods, neighborhood assessments, older
people[/vc_column_text][vc_separator css=”.vc_custom_1555607586280{margin-top: -4px !important;}”][vc_btn title=”Full-text article (Sage Journals)” style=”custom” custom_background=”#8eb223″ custom_text=”#ffffff” align=”center” i_icon_fontawesome=”fa fa-arrow-right” button_block=”true” add_icon=”true” link=”url:https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.sagepub.com%2Fdoi%2Fpdf%2F10.1177%2F2059799120987772|title:Springer%20link|target:%20_blank|”][vc_separator][vc_posts_slider type=”flexslider_slide” count=”All” interval=”0″ slides_content=”teaser” slides_title=”1″ title=”See also:” posttypes=”post” categories=”publications” css=”.vc_custom_1555606478402{background-position: center !important;background-repeat: no-repeat !important;background-size: contain !important;}”][/vc_column][vc_column][vc_empty_space][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row full_width=”stretch_row” css=”.vc_custom_1548353430222{background-color: #8a1465 !important;}”][vc_column][vc_empty_space height=”2px”][/vc_column][/vc_row]